The Times Should Have a Reporter at the Bradley Manning Hearing
Margaret Sullivan – December 5, 2012
In failing to send its own reporter to cover the fascinating and important pretrial testimony of Bradley Manning, The New York Times missed the boat.
Over the past several days, as compelling testimony over the harsh treatment of this 24-year-old Army private turned whistle-blower (or illegal informant, depending on your point of view) flooded the media zone, The Times was notably absent.
- Read More... about The Times Should Have a Reporter at the Bradley Manning Hearing
- Log in or register to post comments

