Welcome!
You are not logged in.
Please register now to gain full access to this site and to receive our newsletter.
If you have already registered you can login here.
You are not logged in.
Please register now to gain full access to this site and to receive our newsletter.
If you have already registered you can login here.

This comment by one public servant in a focus group says it all: "Show me that these stories have happy endings. Show me the discloser who got a promotion and the wrongdoer who lost his job."
This thought encapsulates why our current federal whistleblower protection system has so little credibility: there haven't been any happy endings.
After almost five years of operation not a single wrongdoer has yet been exposed by PSIC, and only two whistleblowers have been given a shot at obtaining a remedy before the Tribunal – years after the alleged reprisals took place – where we believe that they have only a faint hope of success.
David Hutton
It is well known now that too often our financial servants have become financial predators. What is not as well known is how our government servants are also in the game. The game is to sell out or remove protections for the public, so that corporations can earn greater profits, sometimes through illegal acts. The victims are usually consumers.
I've made a short movie about how this sellout is carried out in Canada, allowing this one industry to skim about one billion dollars a week from Canadians, and how your investments are at risk from the very people hired and paid to protect you. It's just 30 minutes long:
http://youtu.be/aNh5laKO22o
Enjoy, and please contact me if you have an interest in mounting a legal challenge to public servants who prey upon the public.
Larry Elford
Advocate for consumer protection within the investment industry
Here are a few comments on this article regarding salmon virus:
1. Originally there were two Atlantic Ocean variants of ISA, east Atlantic and west Atlantic - not Canada. The east Atlantic strain was mutated into a virulent form in 1984 in Norwegian fish farms. From there it has spread most places they have set up shop: Note it is from a Kiibenge powerpoint presentation: http://fishfarmnews.blogspot.com/2011/10/isa-infections-world-wide-sine-1984.html.
Chile now has 28 strains of ISA. That is how quickly it mutates in fish farms. Their outbreak caused $2 bilion in losses, perhaps a quarter of a billion dead fish. Now there is no going back from ISA in Chile - where there are no natural Pacific salmon.
2. Other than fish farm imports of eggs/embryoes, other possible sources of the 'original' ISA in BC is the fish farms in Puget Sound that predate BC's, or from the feds attempt to establish Atlantics here in the first half of the 20th century - about 8 million were planted.
3. There has never been ISA in BC. There is only Atlantic Ocean ISA. That is why it is such a big problem if it has been introduced into BC. It could spread all around the Pacific Ocean from California to Korea.
4. I think it is fairer to say that Nylund made the comments about the 'hard' evidence earlier in the testimony than when Miller revealed her ISA results from the mid-80s. His data tables say he thinks it is likely ISA is in BC. What he meant is that they need virus isolates to sequence. Here is what he has stated in the past: Are Nylund, head of the Fish Diseases Group at the University of Bergen, Norway, has stated: “… based on 20 years of experience, I can guarantee that if British Columbia continues to import salmon eggs from the eastern Atlantic infectious salmon diseases, such as ISA, will arrive in Western Canada”.
5. Chinook salmon are killed by marine anemia. This may turn out to be a mutated strain of ISA. It has proven virulent in both Clayoquot Sound and around Quadra Island.
Dennis Reid
It seems deeply ironic that this government should tackle perceived problems of mismanagement in first nations' finances by trying to impose greater transparency – when it has proceeded in the opposite direction with respect to its own conduct.
This government has cloaked itself in unprecedented levels of secrecy, openly flouting access to information laws, firing watchdogs whose messages contradict the party line, crushing whistleblowers, muzzling public servants of all sorts (even scientists) and witholding budgetary estimates. It has also created a massive taxpayer-funded propaganda machine that bombards us with 'desired sound bites' while obstructing the media and preventing the public from knowing what is really going on.
Never before—except perhaps in wartime—has a Canadian government gone to such lengths to keep its own citizens in the dark. "Sunlight is the best disinfectant", and greater transparency in first nations' affairs is probably a great idea, reducing the potential for misconduct and corruption. So why not for the federal government too?
David Hutton
The AG's report on our broken immigration security system indicates that little progress has been made since the previous AG's report in 1999. In fact the problem goes back much farther.
Brian McAdam, a Foreign Affairs diplomat responsible for security, discovered in 1991 that the Hong Kong mission had been infiltrated by Chinese organized crime and was allowing large numbers of known criminals to migrate freely to Canada and set up shop here. This was serious enough, but an even larger concern is that all attempts to investigate and fix this known problem were stymied by a few bureaucrats and politicians.
McAdam was silenced and forced out of his job. Robert Read, the RCMP investigator who came close to uncovering the truth, became convinced that his bosses were systematically undermining his investigation, went to the media and was then fired.
The RCMP Review Committee rebuked the RCMP for firing Cpl Read and observed that Read had "exposed the fact that the Force had, for seven years, failed to take appropriate action to determine if employees of the Mission had engaged in immigration fraud." However the review committee's conclusions are not binding on the RCMP Commissioner and Cpl Read received no redress.
The Sidewinder Report that the CSIS team produced in 1997 confirmed McAdam's concerns and concluded that an intricate web of connections between Chinese intelligence services and criminal gangs posed a threat to Canada's national security. However, CSIS senior management ordered the project to be aborted and to shred thousands of pages of documentary evidence McAdam provided to both CSIS and the RCMP.
Investigative journalists Andrew Mitrovica and Jeff Sallot wrote in the Globe and Mail in May 2000: “Sidewinder was politically unpalatable and the Canadian government was keen to protect what they believed was the lucrative trading relationships with China.”
The bottom line is that this situation has existed for at least 20 years, during which time apparently incompetent or corrupt bureaucrats and politicians have protected themselves by covering up and silencing witnesses rather than fixing the problems. As a result Canada today is a haven for wealthy and powerful foreign criminals, who can easily gain entry and are then almost impossible to dislodge.
David Hutton
Ask any organization if they tolerate abuse...evidently it doesn't happen. No spokesperson dependent on their paycheck is going to answer that question in the affirmative. They'll look up the policy...which they cannot differentiate from a dictionary, and say "we do not tolerate abuse". I guess if abuse occurred, it would be dealt with appropriately and we'd read about it in the news (transparency and accountability).
Or else staff are (justifiably) unwilling to report since retaliation is assured and redress unlikely. Internal responsibility systems are largely untried, and as a result ineffective if/when they are tried. It is just words on paper. And so is much of the applicable legislation for much the same reason.
Congratulations to RN Diane Shay for standing up and reporting elder abuse. She herself has suffered a lot because of the injustices hurled against her by her employer, City of Cornwall.
I wonder if the managers who did this to her would want an elderly parent of theirs to suffer horribly by being abused. They did not know the law, tried to silence her and let one of their most vulnerable citizens face excruciating pain -- pathetic .
The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is the US agency tasked with protecting government whistleblowers -- the direct counterpart of Canada's Public Sector Integrity Commissioner (PSIC).
Within months of capable new leadership being appointed the previously-dysfunctional OSC is already showing its mettle as a watchdog. This case is a textbook example of what is supposed to happen: the whistleblower has been vindicated, promoted and publicly praised, while those who took the reprisals are gone. And the problem that the whistleblower was trying to draw attention to has been dealt with -- the agency concerned has dramatically changed the way that it conducts audits.
This is how whistleblower protection is supposed to work, yet five years after Canada's legislation was passed, we have yet to see a single victory like this for a Canadian government whistleblower. It's time for PSIC to show that it too can become an effective watchdog.
David Hutton
Red tape is both a cause and a symptom of corruption.
Regulations that are all-encompassing or impossible to meet give officials enormous discretion to make life difficult for those subject to the regulations. So officials can easily extract bribes in return for permits or licences. In this way red tape facilitates corruption.
Excessive red tape can also be a symptom of corruption. Creating burdensome regulations may be a conscious strategy -- a way for corrupt officials to pump up business.
This article describes in Quebec the kind of conditions found in many third-world countries, where impenetrable red tape undermines the rule of law and creates the conditions for predatory officials, corrupt businessmen and organized crime to flourish.
This problem can be tackled by 1) writing simple, practical regulations that are easy to understand and leave little wriggle-room for interpretation, and 2) administering these in a completely transparent manner, for example by making all of the records publicly available for anyone to examine.
David Hutton
This is a long overdue development. The "Perfect Legal Storm" report produced by the Mental Health Commission seems to be having an effect!
Hopefully there will also be more provinces adding status blind harassment and workplace violence provisions to Workplace Health and Safety legislation as well. Where concern for worker safety has fallen on deaf ears, the employer liability argument seems to be gaining ground.
"Perfect Legal Storm" Mental Health Commission Report (pdf)